Ethylene-a-olefin-diene elastomers and methods of making them

ABSTRACT

A process to produce a branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer comprising combining a catalyst precursor and an activator with a feed comprising ethylene, C3 to C12 α-olefins, and a dual-polymerizable diene to obtain a branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer; where the catalyst precursor is selected from pyridyldiamide and quinolinyldiamido transition metal complexes. The branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer may comprise within a range from 40 to 80 wt % of ethylene-derived units by weight of the branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer, and 0.1 to 2 wt % of singly-polymerizable diene derived units, 0.1 to 2 wt % of singly-polymerizable diene derived units, and the remainder comprising C3 to C12 α-olefin derived units, wherein the branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer has a weight average molecular weight (M w ) within a range from 100 kg/mole to 300 kg/mole, an average branching index (g′ avg ) of 0.9 or more, and a branching index at very high M w  (g′ 1000 ) of less than 0.9.

PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 62/628,420, filed Feb. 9, 2018, which is incorporatedherein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention(s) relate in general to ethylene-α-olefin dieneelastomers and methods of making them, and more particularly to branchedethylene-α-olefin diene elastomers and a process to make them usingpyridyldiamido and quinolinyldiamido transition metal complexes in asolution polymerization process.

BACKGROUND

The dual-polymerizable diene 5-vinyl-2-norbornene (VNB) is used in theproduction of ethylene-propylene-diene elastomer (EPDM) for peroxidecuring and can also be utilized to prepare long-chain branched EPDM(b-EPDM). A major challenge in the production of b-EPDM is gelformation, which results from the high reactivity of the vinyl group inthe VNB.

To mitigate gelation, a catalyst must have high endocyclic alkene/vinylselectivity which minimizes hyperbranching via insertion of the pendantvinyl. Using high-throughput experimentation, the inventors haveidentified unique catalysts as suitable catalysts and methods forpolymerization using VNB as a comonomer.

Relevant publications include U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,962,761; 8,058,373;8,013,082; 7,956,140; 7,829,645; 7,511,106; 6,545,088; 6,329,477;6,124,413; 5,698,651; 5,229,478; EP 2221323A1; EP 2115018A1; JPH1160841; JP 09048823; WO 2017/048448; WO 2011/002199; WO 2010/012587;WO 2005/005496; WO 2008/095687; WO 97/32946; and WO 95/16716.

SUMMARY

Disclosed is a process to produce a branched ethylene-α-olefin dieneelastomer (b-EDE) comprising (or consisting essentially of, orconsisting of) combining a catalyst precursor and an activator with afeed comprising ethylene, C3 to C12 α-olefins, and a dual-polymerizablediene to obtain a b-EDE; where the catalyst precursor is selected frompyridyldiamide and quinolinyldiamido transition metal complexes.

Also disclosed is a branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer (b-EDE)comprising (or consisting of, or consisting essentially of) within arange from 40, or 45 to 65, or 70, or 75, or 80 wt % of ethylene-derivedunits by weight of the b-EDE, and 0.1 to 0.8, or 1, or 1.4, or 1.8, or 2wt % of singly-polymerizable diene derived units by weight of the b-EDE,within a range from 0.1 to 0.5, or 0.8, or 1, or 1.4, or 1.8, or 2 wt %of a singly-polymerizable diene derived units by weight of the b-EDE,and the remainder comprising C3 to C12 α-olefin derived units(preferably propylene derived units), wherein the b-EDE has a weightaverage molecular weight (Mw) within a range from 100 kg/mole to 200, or240, or 280, or 300, or 400, or 600, or 750 kg/mole, and wherein theb-EDE has a g′_(avg) of 0.90 or more, and a g′₁₀₀₀ of less than 0.9, or0.85, or 0.8 (or within a range from 0.4, or 0.6, or 0.65 to 0.8 or 0.85or 0.9).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a gel permeation chromatogram and mass balance of inventivebranched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer of Sample 3.

FIG. 2a is a plot of phase angle versus complex modulus for theinventive branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer from the PDAcatalyst.

FIG. 2b is a plot of phase angle versus complex modulus for theinventive branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer from the QDAcatalyst.

FIG. 3 is an extensional viscosity trace at various rates for Sample 1elastomer (no VNB) at 150° C.

FIG. 4 is an extensional viscosity trace at various rates for theinventive branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer (0.2 wt % VNB) ofSample 3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The pyridyldiamido and quinolinyldiamido transition metal complexesdescribed herein were tested for terpolymerization capability atincreasing VNB feed rates and a target ethylene content of approximately60%. Analytical techniques such as gel permeation chromatograph (GPC),dynamic shear rheology, and extensional viscosity analyses of theresulting polymers were all consistent with higher long-chain branching(LCB) levels as the VNB content was increased. Performing the sameexperiments with ENB as the diene resulted in, for instance, 0.8 wt %ENB incorporation, indicating that approximately 75% of the vinyl groupof VNB in the polymer was reacted to form long chain branches. GPC-4Danalysis of the VNB-EPDM samples resulted in 100% recovery, whichsuggested negligible gel content in the material. However, in-reactorgel was obtained upon opening the reactor, albeit at a lower amountcompared with those observed using metallocene-type polymerizationcatalysts. Thus, the inventors have found an improved method of formingethylene-α-olefin diene elastomers, as set forth more particularlyherein.

In any embodiment, the “dual-polymerizable dienes” are diene monomersselected from vinyl substituted strained bicyclic and unconjugateddienes, and alpha-omega linear dienes where both sites of unsaturationare polymerizable by a polymerization catalyst (e.g., Ziegler-Natta,vanadium, metallocene, etc.); and more preferably from vinyl norbornenesand C7 to C12 alpha-omega linear dienes (e.g., 1,7-heptadiene and1,9-decadiene), and is most preferably 5-vinyl-2-norbornene (VNB). Theb-EDE formed therefrom comprises “dual-polymerizable diene derivedmonomer units”.

In any embodiment, the “singly-polymerizable dienes” are diene monomersin which only one of the double bonds is activated by a polymerizationcatalyst and is selected from cyclic and linear alkylenes, non-limitingexamples of which include an unconjugated diene (and other structureswhere each double bond is two carbons away from the other),5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, 4-vinylcyclohexeneand other strained bicyclicand unconjugated dienes, and dicyclopentadiene. More preferably, thesingly-polymerizable diene is selected from C7 to C30 cyclicsingly-polymerizable dienes. Most preferably the singly-polymerizablediene is 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene (ENB). The b-EDE formed therefromcomprises “singly-polymerizable diene derived monomer units”.

In any embodiment, a “branched” ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer(b-EDE) has a branching index value at a molecular weight of 1×10⁶g/mol, g′₁₀₀₀, of less than or equal to 0.860 as calculated using theoutput of the GPC-IR5-LS-VIS method as follows. The average intrinsicviscosity, [η_(avg)], of the sample is calculated by:

${\lbrack\eta\rbrack_{avg} = \frac{\sum\;{c_{i}\lbrack\eta\rbrack}_{i}}{\sum\; c_{i}}},$where the summations are over the chromatographic slices, “i”, betweenthe integration limits. The branching index g′_(avg) is defined as:

$g_{avg}^{\prime} = {\frac{\lbrack\eta\rbrack_{avg}}{{kM}_{v}^{\alpha}}.}$

In any embodiment, the branched polymer has minimal gel content. As usedherein, the “gel content” refers to an insoluble portion (in hydrocarbonsolvent) of polymer determined by extraction of a sample of the b-EDE ina hydrocarbon solvent such as cyclohexane, toluene or isohexane, whichare typically used to dissolve b-EDE. In any embodiment, the gel contentof the inventive b-EDE is less than 5, or 1, or 0.1 wt %.

In any embodiment, the “pyridyldiamido and quinolinyldiamido transitionmetal complexes” include organometallic complexes of a transition metalion, especially titanium, zirconium or hafnium, with one or more ligandsthat include at least one pyridyl and/or quinolinyl group and at leasttwo other alkylamine ligands, and at least one leaving group, preferablya halogen or alkyl group, that is reactive towards the appropriate boronand/or aluminum-based activator.

In any embodiment, the pyridyldiamido and quinolinyldiamido transitionmetal complexes are selected from one of the following structures:

-   -   wherein M is titanium, hafnium or zirconium, most preferably        hafnium;    -   R¹ and R¹⁰ are independently selected from the group consisting        of hydrocarbyls (such as alkyls, aryls), substituted        hydrocarbyls (substituents pendant to the hydrocarbyl),        heterohydrocarbyls (non-carbon atoms within the hydrocarbyl),        and silyl groups; most preferably R¹ and R¹⁰ comprise an aniline        structure that may be substituted with C1 to C5 alkyls;    -   R² and R⁹ are each, independently, divalent hydrocarbyls or a        chemical bond;    -   R³, R⁴, R⁵, R⁶, R⁷, and R⁸ are independently selected from the        group consisting of hydrogen, hydrocarbyls (e.g., alkyls and        aryls), substituted hydrocarbyls (e.g., heteroaryl), alkoxy,        aryloxy, halogen, amino, and silyl, and wherein adjacent R        groups may be joined to form a substituted or unsubstituted        hydrocarbyl or heterocyclic ring, where the ring has 5, 6, 7, or        8 ring atoms and where substitutions on the ring can join to        form additional rings;    -   X is an anionic leaving group, where the X groups may be the        same or different and any two X groups may be linked to form a        dianionic leaving group; and    -   Z is —(R¹¹)_(p)QJ(R¹²)_(q)—, wherein Q is carbon, oxygen,        nitrogen, or silicon (preferably nitrogen), and where J is        carbon or silicon (preferably carbon), p is 1 or 2; and q is 1        or 2; and R¹¹ and R¹² are independently selected from the group        consisting of hydrogen, hydrocarbyls (preferably alkyls), and        substituted hydrocarbyls, and wherein adjacent R¹¹ and R¹²        groups may be joined to form an aromatic or saturated,        substituted or unsubstituted hydrocarbyl ring, where the ring        has 5, 6, 7, or 8 ring carbon atoms and where substitutions on        the ring can join to form additional rings; most preferably Z        forms a bicyclic hydrocarbyl comprising a C6 cyclic portion and        a C4 to C6 cyclic portion, where an example of Z is a divalent        tetrahydroindenyl or divalent tetrahydronaphthalene.

In any embodiment, the pyridyldiamido and quinolinyldiamido transitionmetal complexes are selected from one of the following structures:

wherein the “Me” represents “methyl” and “iPr” represents “iso-propyl”,and wherein these groups could also variously be any C1 to C10 alkyl(normal, iso, and/or tertiary), and the saturated ring may variously bea 4 to 6 membered ring, interchangeably between the two structures.

Thus in any embodiment is a process to produce a branchedethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer (b-EDE) comprising (or consistingessentially of, or consisting of) combining a catalyst precursor and anactivator with a feed comprising ethylene, C3 to C12 α-olefins, and adual-polymerizable diene to obtain a b-EDE; where the catalyst precursoris selected from pyridyldiamide and quinolinyldiamido transition metalcomplexes.

The catalyst or catalyst precursor must also be combined with at leastone “activator” to effect polymerization of the cyclic olefin monomersand ethylene, wherein the activator preferably comprises anon-coordinating borate anion and a bulky organic cation. In anyembodiment, the non-coordinating borate anion comprises atetra(perfluorinated C6 to C14 aryl)borate anion and substitutedversions thereof; most preferably the non-coordinating borate anioncomprises a tetra(pentafluorophenyl)borate anion ortetra(perfluoronaphthyl)borate anion.

Preferably the bulky organic cation is selected from the followingstructures (a) and (b):

wherein each R group is independently hydrogen, a C6 to C14 aryl (e.g.,phenyl, naphthyl, etc.), a C1 to C10 or C20 alkyl, or substitutedversions thereof; and more preferably at least one R group is an C6 toC14 aryl or substituted versions thereof.

In any embodiment, the bulky organic cation is a reducible Lewis Acid,especially a trityl-type cation (wherein each “R” group in (a) is aryl)capable of extracting a ligand from the catalyst precursor, where each“R” group is an C6 to C14 aryl group (phenyl, naphthyl, etc.) orsubstituted C6 to C14 aryl, and preferably the reducible Lewis acid istriphenyl carbenium and substituted versions thereof.

Also, in any embodiment, the bulky organic cation is a Brønsted acidcapable of donating a proton to the catalyst precursor, wherein at leastone “R” group in (b) is hydrogen. Exemplary bulky organic cations ofthis type in general include ammoniums, oxoniums, phosphoniums,silyliums, and mixtures thereof; preferably ammoniums of methylamine,aniline, dimethylamine, diethylamine, N-methylaniline, diphenylamine,trimethylamine, triethylamine, N,N-dimethylaniline, methyldiphenylamine,pyridine, p-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline, and p-nitro-N,N-dimethylaniline;phosphoniums from triethylphosphine, triphenylphosphine, anddiphenylphosphine; oxoniums from ethers, such as dimethyl ether diethylether, tetrahydrofuran, and dioxane; and sulfoniums from thioethers,such as diethyl thioethers and tetrahydrothiophene, and mixturesthereof.

The catalyst precursor preferably reacts with the activator upon theircombination to form a “catalyst” or “activated catalyst” that can theneffect the polymerization of monomers. The catalyst may be formed beforecombining with monomers, after combining with monomers, or simultaneoustherewith.

In any embodiment, the combining takes place at a temperature within arange from 80, or 90° C. to 120, or 140, or 160° C. and a pressurewithin a range from 0.5 MPa to 4, or 6, or 8 MPa. Most preferably thecombining in a solution process, meaning that all components in thepolymerization are soluble in the medium (diluent and/or monomers) or atleast 80, or 90 wt % of the components are soluble and dissolved in themedium.

In any embodiment, the solution process can be carried out in one ormore single-phase, liquid-filled, stirred tank reactor with continuousflow of feeds to the system and continuous withdrawal of products understeady state conditions. When more than one reactor is used, thereactors may be operated in a serial or parallel configuration makingessentially the same or different polymer components. Advantageously,the reactors would produce polymers with different properties, such asdifferent molecular weights, or different monomer compositions, ordifferent levels of long-chain branching, or any combinations thereof.All polymerizations can be performed in a system with a solventcomprising any one or more of C4 to C12 alkanes, using solublemetallocene catalysts or other single-site catalysts and discrete,non-coordinating borate anion as co-catalysts. A homogeneous dilutesolution of tri-n-octyl aluminum or other aluminum alkyl in a suitablesolvent may be used as a scavenger in concentrations appropriate tomaintain reaction. Chain transfer agents, such as hydrogen, can be addedto control molecular weight. Polymerizations can be at high temperaturesdescribed above and high conversions to maximize macromer re-insertionsthat create long chain branching, if so desired. This combination of ahomogeneous, continuous, solution process helped to ensure that theproducts had narrow composition and sequence distributions.

In any embodiment the process also comprises further combining asingly-polymerizable diene. Also in any embodiment the α-olefinscomprise (or consist of) propylene. Finally, hydrogen is preferablypresent to less than 5, or 1, or 0.8, or 0.4, or 0.2 sccm (standardcubic centimeter per min.) from the feed; and most preferably hydrogenis absent from the feed. When referring to the “feed”, this componentsthat are combined include only those substances in the feed.

Produced from the process is a branched ethylene-α-olefin dieneelastomer (b-EDE) comprising (or consisting of, or consistingessentially of) within a range from 40, or 45 to 65, or 70, or 75, or 80wt % of ethylene-derived units by weight of the b-EDE, 0.1 to 0.8, or 1,or 1.4, or 1.8, or 2 wt % of singly-polymerizable diene derived units byweight of the b-EDE, within a range from 0.1 to 0.5, or 0.8, or 1, or1.4, or 1.8, or 2 wt % of a singly-polymerizable diene derived units byweight of the b-EDE, and the remainder comprising C3 to C12 α-olefinderived units (preferably propylene derived units), wherein the b-EDEhas a weight average molecular weight (Mw) within a range from 100kg/mole to 200, or 240, or 280, or 300, or 400, or 600, or 750 kg/mole,and wherein the b-EDE has a g′_(avg) of 0.9 or more, and a g′₁₀₀₀ ofless than 0.9, or 0.85, or 0.8 (or within a range from 0.4, or 0.6, or0.65 to 0.8 or 0.85 or 0.9).

The inventive b-EDEs may be useful in any number of applications such asrubber profiles (like automotive solid and sponge profiles, buildingprofiles), hoses, mechanical goods, films (cast and/or blown) and sheetsof material, such as for roofing applications, as well as thermoformedarticles, blow molded articles, rotomolded articles, and injectionmolded articles. Particularly desirable end uses include automotivecomponents and gaskets. Any of these articles may be foamed articleswhich are formed by means known in the art. Foamed or not, some specificuses of the inventive b-EDEs include weather stripping, heat insulation,opening trim, and car trunk or car hood seals.

The various descriptive elements and numerical ranges disclosed hereinfor the inventive process and b-EDE therefrom can be combined with otherdescriptive elements and numerical ranges to describe the invention(s);further, for a given element, any upper numerical limit can be combinedwith any lower numerical limit described herein, including the examplesin jurisdictions that allow such combinations. The features of theinventions are demonstrated in the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

The synthesis of the catalyst precursor is described here, as well asthe polymerization examples.

Proton (¹H) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Catalyst characterization wasaccomplished using proton NMR, wherein the ¹H NMR data was collected at23° C. in a 5 mm probe using a Varian spectrometer with a ¹H frequencyof at least 400 MHz. Data was recorded using a maximum pulse width of45°, 8 sec between pulses and signal averaging 120 transients. All NMRspectra were referenced using the peak corresponding to the deuteratedsolvent.

Starting Reagents Sodium hydride (NaH), 8-bromoquinolin-2(1H)-one,t-butyldimethylsilylchloride, n-butyllithium, t-butyllithium, Pd₂(dba)₃,2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (XPhos), K₂CO₃,dichloromethane, methanol, POCl₃, n-hexane,1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylene diamine(TMEDA), pentane, 1,2-dibromotetrafluoroethane, Na₂SO₄, triethylamine,acetic anhydride, 4-(dimethylamino)pydridine (DMAP), ethyl acetate,Na₂CO₃, potassium hydroxide (KOH), pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC),aniline, toluene, TiCl₄, NaBH₃CN, acetic acid, CDCl₃,2-isopropoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane, 1,4-dioxane,cesium carbonate, Pd(PPh₃)₄, benzene, Hf(NMe₂)₄, Me₃Al,6-bromopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,6-diisopropylaniline, indan-1-ol and2-isopropoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane were purchased fromcommercial sources and used as received. Hf(NMe₂)₂Cl₂,1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), and dimethylmagnesium were prepared followingpublished procedures (Erker et al., in 19 ORGANOMETALLICS 127 (2000);Coates and Heslop, in J. CHEM. SOC. A 514 (1968); Andersen et al., in J.CHEM. SOC., DALTON TRANS. 809 (1977)). Tetrahydrofuran (THF, Merck) anddiethyl ether (Merck) were freshly distilled from benzophenone ketylwere used for organometallic synthesis and catalysis.

8-(2,6-Diisopropylphenylamino)quinolin-2(1H)-one To a suspension of NaH(5.63 g of 60 wt % in mineral oil, 140 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (1000mL) was added 8-bromoquinolin-2(1H)-one (30.0 g, 134 mmol) in smallportions at 0° C. The obtained reaction mixture was warmed to 23° C.(room temperature), stirred for 30 min, then cooled to 0° C. Thent-butyldimethylsilylchloride (20.2 g, 134 mmol) was added in oneportion. This mixture was stirred for 30 min at 23° C. and then pouredinto water (1 L). The protected 8-bromoquinolin-2(1H)-one was extractedwith diethyl ether (3×400 mL). The combined extracts were dried overNa₂SO₄ and then evaporated to dryness. Yield 45.2 g (quant., 99% purityby GC/MS) of a dark red oil. To a solution of 2,6-diisopropylaniline(27.7 mL, 147 mmol) and toluene (1.5 L) was added n-butyllithium (60.5mL, 147 mmol, 2.5 M in hexanes) at 23° C. The obtained suspension washeated briefly to 100° C. and then cooled to 23° C. To the reactionmixture was added Pd₂(dba)₃ (dba=dibenzylideneacetone) (2.45 g, 2.68mmol) and XPhos (2.55 g, 5.36 mmol) followed by the addition of theprotected 8-bromoquinolin-2(1H)-one (45.2 g, 134 mmol). The obtaineddark brown suspension was heated at 60° C. until lithium saltprecipitate disappeared (ca. 30 min). The resulting dark red solutionwas quenched by addition of water (100 mL), and the organic layer wasseparated, dried over Na₂SO₄ and then evaporated to dryness. Theobtained oil was dissolved in a mixture of dichloromethane (1000 mL) andmethanol (500 mL), followed by an addition of 12 M HCl (50 mL). Thereaction mixture was stirred at 23° C. for 3 hr., then poured into 5%K₂CO₃ (2 L). The product was extracted with dichloromethane (3×700 mL).The combined extracts were dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, and thenevaporated to dryness. The resulting solid was triturated with n-hexane(300 mL), and the obtained suspension collected on a glass frit. Theprecipitate was dried in vacuum. Yield 29.0 g (67%) of a marsh-greensolid. Anal. calc. for C₂₁H₂₄N₂O: C, 78.71; H, 7.55; N, 8.74. Found: C,79.00; H, 7.78; N, 8.50. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 13.29 (br.s, 1H), 7.80-7.81(d, 1H, J=9.5 Hz), 7.35-7.38 (m, 1H), 7.29-7.30 (m, 3H), 6.91-6.95 (m,2H), 6.58-6.60 (d, 1H, J=9.5 Hz), 6.27-6.29 (m, 1H), 3.21 (sept, 2H,J=6.9 Hz), 1.25-1.26 (d, 6H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.11-1.12 (d, 6H, J=6.9 Hz).

2-Chloro-N-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)quinolin-8-amine 29.0 g (90.6 mmol) of8-(2,6-diisopropylphenylamino)quinolin-2(1H)-one was added to 400 mL ofPOCl₃ in one portion. The resulting suspension was heated for 40 hrs. at105° C., then cooled to 23° C., and poured into 4000 cm³ of a crushedice. The crude product was extracted with 3×400 mL of diethyl ether. Thecombined extract was dried over K₂CO₃ and then evaporated to dryness.The resulting solid was triturated with 30 mL of cold n-hexane, and theformed suspension was collected on a glass frit. The obtained solid wasdried in vacuum. Yield 29.0 g (95%) of a yellow-green solid. Anal. calc.for C₂₁H₂₃N₂Cl: C, 74.43; H, 6.84; N, 8.27. Found: C, 74.68; H, 7.02; N,7.99. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 8.04-8.05 (d, 1H, J=8.6 Hz), 7.38-7.39 (d, 1H,J=8.5 Hz), 7.33-7.36 (m, 1H), 7.22-7.27 (m, 4H), 7.04-7.06 (d, 1H, J=8.1Hz), 6.27-6.29 (d, 1H, J=7.8 Hz), 3.20 (sept, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.19-1.20(d, 6H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.10-1.11 (d, 6H, J=6.9 Hz).

8-Bromo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol To a mixture of 78.5 g (530mmol) of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol, 160 mL (1.06 mol) ofN,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine, and 3000 mL of pentane cooled to−20° C. 435 mL (1.09 mol) of 2.5 M nBuLi in hexanes was added dropwise.The obtained mixture was refluxed for 12 hrs. then cooled to −80° C.,and 160 mL (1.33 mol) of 1,2-dibromotetrafluoroethane was added. Theobtained mixture was allowed to warm to 23° C. and then stirred for 12hrs. at this temperature. After that, 100 mL of water was added. Theresulting mixture was diluted with 2000 mL of water, and the organiclayer was separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with 3×400 mL oftoluene. The combined organic extract was dried over Na₂SO₄ and thenevaporated to dryness. The residue was distilled using the Kugelrohrapparatus, b.p. 150-160° C./1 mbar. The obtained yellow oil wasdissolved in 100 mL of triethylamine, and the formed solution was addeddropwise to a stirred solution of 71.0 mL (750 mmol) of acetic anhydrideand 3.00 g (25.0 mmol) of 4-dimethylaminopyridine in 105 mL oftriethylamine. The formed mixture was stirred for 5 min, then 1000 mL ofwater was added, and the obtained mixture was stirred for 12 hrs. Afterthat, the reaction mixture was extracted with 3×200 mL of ethyl acetate.The combined organic extract was washed with aqueous Na₂CO₃, dried overNa₂SO₄, and then evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified byflash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent: hexane-ethylacetate=30:1, vol.). The isolated ester was dissolved in 1500 mL ofmethanol, 81.0 g (1.45 mol) of KOH was added, and the obtained mixturewas heated to reflux for 3 hrs. The reaction mixture was then cooled to23° C. and poured into 4000 mL of water. The title product was extractedwith 3×300 mL of dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was driedover Na₂SO₄ and then evaporated to dryness. Yield 56.0 g (47%) of awhite crystalline solid. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.38-7.41 (m, 1H, 7-H);7.03-7.10 (m, 2H, 5,6-H); 5.00 (m, 1H, 1-H), 2.81-2.87 (m, 1H, 4/4′-H),2.70-2.74 (m, 1H, 4′/4-H), 2.56 (br.s., 1H, OH), 2.17-2.21 (m, 2H,2,2′-H), 1.74-1.79 (m, 2H, 3,3′-H).

8-Bromo-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one To a solution of 56.0 g (250mmol) of 8-bromo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol in 3500 mL ofdichloromethane was added 265 g (1.23 mol) of pyridinium chlorochromate(PCC). The resulting mixture was stirred for 5 hrs. at 23° C., thenpassed through a pad of silica gel 60 (500 mL; 40-63 μm), and finallyevaporated to dryness. Yield 47.6 g (88%) of a colorless solid. ¹H NMR(CDCl₃): δ 7.53 (m, 1H, 7-H); 7.18-7.22 (m, 2H, 5,6-H); 2.95 (t, J=6.1Hz, 2H, 4,4′-H); 2.67 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 2H, 2,2′-H); 2.08 (quint, J=6.1 Hz,J=6.6 Hz, 2H, 3,3′-H).

(8-Bromo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)phenylamine To a stirredsolution of 21.6 g (232 mmol) of aniline in 140 mL of toluene was added10.93 g (57.6 mmol) of TiCl₄ over 30 min at 23° C. under argonatmosphere. The resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min at 90° C.followed by an addition of 13.1 g (57.6 mmol) of8-bromo-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one. This mixture was stirred for 10min at 90° C., then cooled to 23° C., and poured into 500 mL of water.The product was extracted with 3×50 mL of ethyl acetate. The combinedorganic extract was dried over Na₂SO₄, evaporated to dryness, and theresidue was re-crystallized from 10 mL of ethyl acetate. The obtainedcrystalline solid was dissolved in 200 mL of methanol, 7.43 g (118 mmol)of NaBH₃CN and 3 mL of acetic acid were added in argon atmosphere. Thismixture was heated to reflux for 3 h, then cooled to 23° C., andevaporated to dryness. The residue was diluted with 200 mL of water, andcrude product was extracted with 3×100 mL of ethyl acetate. The combinedorganic extract was dried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. Theresidue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm,eluent: hexane-ethyl acetate-triethylamine=100:10:1, vol.). Yield 13.0 g(75%) of a yellow oil. Anal. Calc. for C₁₆H₁₆BrN: C, 63.59; H, 5.34;

N, 4.63. Found: C, 63.82; H, 5.59; N, 4.49. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.44 (m,1H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 7.05-7.11 (m, 2H), 6.68-6.73 (m, 3H), 4.74 (m, 1H),3.68 (br.s, 1H, NH), 2.84-2.89 (m, 1H), 2.70-2.79 (m, 1H), 2.28-2.32 (m,1H), 1.85-1.96 (m, 1H), 1.76-1.80 (m, 1H), 1.58-1.66 (m, 1H).

N-Phenyl-8-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-amineTo a solution of 13.0 g (43.2 mmol) of(8-bromo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)phenylamine in 250 mLtetrahydrofuran (THF) was added 17.2 mL (43.0 mmol) of 2.5 M “BuLi at−80° C. Further on, this mixture was stirred for 1 hr. at thistemperature, and 56.0 mL (90.3 mmol) of 1.6 M ^(t)BuLi in pentane wasadded. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hr. at the sametemperature. Then, 16.7 g (90.0 mmol) of2-isopropoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane was added. Afterthat the cooling bath was removed, and the resulting mixture was stirredfor 1 hr. at 23° C. Finally, 10 mL of water was added, and the obtainedmixture was evaporated to dryness. The residue was diluted with 200 mLof water, and crude product was extracted with 3×100 mL of ethylacetate. The combined organic extract was dried over Na₂SO₄ and thenevaporated to dryness. Yield 15.0 g (98%) of a yellow oil. Anal. Calc.for C₂₂H₂₈BNO₂: C 75.65; H 8.08; N 4.01. Found: C 75.99; H 8.32; N 3.79.¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.59 (m, 1H), 7.18-7.23 (m, 4H), 6.71-6.74 (m, 3H),5.25 (m, 1H), 3.87 (br.s, 1H, NH), 2.76-2.90 (m, 2H), 2.12-2.16 (m, 1H),1.75-1.92 (m, 3H), 1.16 (s, 6H), 1.10 (s, 6H).

2-(8-Anilino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)-N-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)quinolin-8-amineTo a solution of 13.8 g (41.0 mmol) of2-chloro-N-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)quinolin-8-amine in 700 mL of1,4-dioxane were added 15.0 g (43.0 mmol) ofN-phenyl-8-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-amine,35.0 g (107 mmol) of cesium carbonate and 400 mL of water. The obtainedmixture was purged with argon for 10 min followed by an addition of 2.48g (2.15 mmol) of Pd(PPh₃)₄. The formed mixture was stirred for 2 hrs. at90° C., then cooled to 23° C. To the obtained two-phase mixture 700 mLof n-hexane was added. The organic layer was separated, washed withbrine, dried over Na₂SO₄, and then evaporated to dryness. The residuewas purified by flash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent:hexane-ethyl acetate-triethylamine=100:5:1, vol.) and thenre-crystallized from 150 mL of n-hexane. Yield 15.1 g (70%) of a yellowpowder. Anal. calc. for C₃₇H₃₉N₃: C 84.53; H 7.48; N 7.99. Found: C84.60; H 7.56; N 7.84. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.85-7.87 (d, J=7.98 Hz, 1H),7.56 (br.s, 1H), 7.43-7.45 (d, J=8.43 Hz, 1H), 7.21-7.38 (m, 6H), 7.12(t, J=7.77 Hz, 1H), 6.87-6.89 (d, J=7.99 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (t, J=7.99 Hz,1H), 6.36 (t, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 6.14-6.21 (m, 3H), 5.35 (br.s, 1H), 3.56(br.s, 1H), 3.20-3.41 (m, 2H), 2.83-2.99 (m, 2H), 2.10-2.13 (m, 1H),1.77-1.92 (m, 3H), 1.13-1.32 (m, 12H).

Complex of quinolinyldiamido (QDA) Benzene (50 mL) was added to2-(8-anilino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)-N-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)quinolin-8-amine(2.21 g, 4.20 mmol) and Hf(NMe₂)₄ (1.58 g, 4.45 mmol) to form a clearorange solution. The mixture was heated to reflux for 16 hrs. to form aclear red-orange solution. Most of the volatiles were removed byevaporation under a stream of nitrogen to afford a concentrated redsolution (ca. 5 mL) that was warmed to 40° C. Then hexane (30 mL) wasadded and the mixture was stirred to cause orange crystalline solid toform. This slurry was cooled to −40° C. for 30 min. then the solid wascollected by filtration and washed with additional cold hexane (2×10mL). The resulting quinolinyldiamide hafnium diamide was isolated as anorange solid and dried under reduced pressure (2.90 g, 3.67 mmol, 87.4%yield). This solid was dissolved in toluene (25 mL) and Me₃Al (12.8 mL,25.6 mmol) was added. The mixture was warmed to 40° C. for 1 hr. thenevaporated under a stream of nitrogen. The crude product (2.54 g) wasabout 90% pure by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The solid was purified byrecrystallization from CH₂Cl₂-hexanes (20 mL-20 mL) by slow evaporationto give pure product as orange crystals (1.33 g, 43.2% from ligand). Themother liquor was further concentrated for a second crop (0.291 g, 9.5%from ligand). (Solvent: CD₂Cl₂ (ca. 10 mg sample/mL solvent))(Referencepeak=CHDCl₂δ5.32 ppm).

Preparation of N-[(6-bromopyridin-2-yl)methyl]-2,6-diisopropylaniline Asolution of 85.0 g (457 mmol) of 6-bromopyridine-2-carbaldehyde and 80.9g (457 mmol) of 2,6-diisopropylaniline in 1000 mL of ethanol wasrefluxed for 8 hrs. The obtained solution was evaporated to dryness, andthe residue was re-crystallized from 200 mL of methanol. In argonatmosphere, to thus obtained 113.5 g (329 mmol) ofN-[(1E)-(6-bromopyridin-2-yl)methylene]-2,6-diisopropylaniline wereadded 33.16 g (526 mmol) of NaBH₃CN, 9 mL of acetic acid and 1000 mL ofmethanol. This mixture was refluxed for 12 h, then cooled to 23° C.,poured into 1000 mL of water, and crude product was extracted with 3×200mL of ethyl acetate. The combined extract was dried over sodium sulfateand evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified by flashchromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent: hexane-ethylacetate=10:1, vol.). Yield 104.4 g (66%) of a yellow oil. Anal. calc.for C₁₈H₂₃BrN₂: C, 62.25; H, 6.68; N, 8.07. Found: C, 62.40; H, 6.87; N,7.90. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.50 (m, 1H, 4-H in Py), 7.38 (m, 1H, 5-H inPy), 7.29 (m, 1H, 3-H in Py), 7.05-7.12 (m, 3H, 3,4,5-H in2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃), 4.18 (s, 2H, CH₂NH), 3.94 (br.s, 1H, NH), 3.33 (sept,J=6.8 Hz, 2H, CHMe2), 1.23 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 12H, CHMe2).

Preparation of 7-bromoindan-1-ol To a mixture of 100 g (746 mmol) ofindan-1-ol, 250 mL (1.64 mol) of N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine,and 3000 mL of pentane cooled to −20° C., 655 mL (1.64 mol) of 2.5 MnBuLi in hexanes was added. The reaction mixture was then refluxed for12 hrs. and then cooled to −80° C. Then, 225 mL (1.87 mol) of1,2-dibromotetrafluoroethane was added, and the resulting mixture wasallowed to warm to 23° C. This mixture was stirred for 12 h, and then100 mL of water was added. The resulting mixture was diluted with 2000mL of water, and the organic layer was separated. The aqueous layer wasextracted with 3×400 mL of toluene. The combined organic extract wasdried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. The residue was distilledusing a Kugelrohr apparatus, b.p. 120-140° C./1 mbar. The resultingyellow oil was dissolved in 50 mL of triethylamine, and the obtainedsolution added dropwise to a stirred solution of 49.0 mL (519 mmol) ofacetic anhydride and 4.21 g (34.5 mmol) of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine in70 mL of triethylamine. The resulting mixture was stirred for 5 min,then 1000 mL of water was added, and stirring was continued for 12 hrs.Then, the reaction mixture was extracted with 3×200 mL of ethyl acetate.The combined organic extract was washed with aqueous Na₂CO₃, dried overNa₂SO₄, and evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified by flashchromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent: hexane-ethylacetate=30:1, vol.). The resulting ester was dissolved in 1000 mL ofmethanol, 50.5 g (900 mmol) of KOH was added, and this mixture wasrefluxed for 3 hrs. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 23° C. andpoured into 4000 mL of water. Crude product was extracted with 3×300 mLof dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was dried over Na₂SO₄and evaporated to dryness. Yield 41.3 g (26%) of a white crystallinesolid. Anal. Calc for C₉H₉BrO: C, 50.73; H 4.26. Found: C 50.85; H 4.48.¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.34 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H, 6-H); 7.19 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H,4-H); 7.12 (dd, J=7.6 Hz, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, 5-H); 5.33 (dd, J=2.6 Hz, J=6.9Hz, 1H, 1-H), 3.18-3.26 (m, 1H, 3- or 3′-H), 3.09 (m, 2H, 3,3′-H); 2.73(m, 2H, 2,2′-H).

Preparation of 7-bromoindan-1-one to a solution of 37.9 g (177 mmol) of7-bromoindan-1-ol in 3500 mL of dichloromethane 194 g (900 mmol) ofpyridinium chlorochromate was added. The resulting mixture was stirredat 23° C. for 5 hrs., then passed through a silica gel pad (500 mL), andthe elute was evaporated to dryness. Yield 27.6 g (74%) of a whitecrystalline solid. Anal. Calc for C₉H₇BrO: C, 51.22; H, 3.34. Found: C,51.35; H, 3.41. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.51 (m, 1H, 6-H); 7.36-7.42 (m, 2H,4,5-H); 3.09 (m, 2H, 3,3′-H); 2.73 (m, 2H, 2,2′-H).

Preparation of 7-bromo-N-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine To astirred solution of 10.4 g (112 mmol) of aniline in 60 mL of toluene5.31 g (28.0 mmol) of TiCl₄ was added for 30 min at 23° C. in argonatmosphere. The resulting mixture was stirred at 90° C. for 30 minfollowed by an addition of 6.00 g (28.0 mmol) of 7-bromoindan-1-one. Theresulting mixture was stirred for 10 min at 90° C., poured into 500 mLof water, and crude product was extracted with 3×100 mL of ethylacetate. The organic layer was separated, dried over Na₂SO₄, and thenevaporated to dryness. The residue was crystallized from 10 mL of ethylacetate at −30° C. The resulting solid was separated and dried invacuum. After that it was dissolved in 100 mL of methanol, 2.70 g (42.9mmol) of NaBH₃CN and 0.5 mL of glacial acetic acid was added. Theresulting mixture was refluxed for 3 hrs. in argon atmosphere. Theresulting mixture was cooled to 23° C. and then evaporated to dryness.The residue was diluted with 200 mL of water, and crude product wasextracted with 3×50 mL of ethyl acetate. The combined organic extractwas dried over Na₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. The residue waspurified by flash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent:hexane-ethyl acetate-triethylamine=100:10:1, vol.). Yield 5.50 g (68%)of a yellow oil. Anal. calc. for C₁₅H₁₄BrN: C, 62.52; H, 4.90; N 4.86.Found: C, 62.37; H, 5.05; N 4.62. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.38 (m, 1H, 6-H inindane); 7.22 (m, 3H, 3,5-H in phenyl and 4-H in indane); 7.15 (m, 1H,5-H in indane); 6.75 (m, 1H, 4-H in indane); 6.69 (m, 2H, 2,6-H inphenyl); 4.94 (m, 1H, 1-H in indane); 3.82 (br.s, 1H, NH); 3.17-3.26 (m,1H, 3- or 3′-H in indane); 2.92-2.99 (m, 2H, 3′- or 3-H in indane);2.22-2.37 (m, 2H, 2,2′-H in indane).

Preparation ofN-phenyl-7-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amineTo a solution of 2.50 g (8.70 mmol) of7-bromo-N-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine in 50 mL THF 3.50 mL (8.70mmol) of 2.5 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes was added at −80° C. in argonatmosphere. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 1 hr. at thistemperature. Then, 11.1 mL (17.8 mmol) of 1.7 M ^(t)BuLi in pentane wasadded, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 hr. Then, 3.23 g (17.4mmol) of 2-isopropoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane was added.Then, the cooling bath was removed, and the resulting mixture wasstirred for 1 hr. at 23° C. To the formed mixture 10 mL of water wasadded, and the resulting mixture was evaporated to dryness. The residuewas diluted with 200 mL of water, and the title product was extractedwith 3×50 mL of ethyl acetate. The combined organic extract was driedover Na₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. Yield 2.80 g (96%) of a lightyellow oil. Anal. calc. For C₂₁H₂₆BNO₂: C 75.24; H 7.82; N 4.18. Found:C 75.40; H 8.09; N 4.02. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.63 (m, 1H, 6-H in indane);7.37-7.38 (m, 1H, 4-H in indane); 7.27-7.30 (m, 1H, 5-H in indane); 7.18(m, 2H, 3,5-H in phenyl); 6.65-6.74 (m, 3H, 2,4,6-H in phenyl);5.20-5.21 (m, 1H, 1-H in indane); 3.09-3.17 (m, 1H, 3- or 3′-H inindane); 2.85-2.92 (m, 1H, 3′- or 3-H in indane); 2.28-2.37 (m, 1H, 2-or 2′-H in indane); 2.13-2.19 (m, 1H, 2′- or 2-H in indane); 1.20 (s,6-H, 4,5-Me in BPin); 1.12 (s, 6H, 4′,5′-Me in BPin).

Preparation of7-(6-(((2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino)methyl)pyridin-2-yl)-N-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amineA solution of 2.21 g (21.0 mmol) of Na₂CO₃ in a mixture of 80 mL ofwater and 25 mL of methanol was purged with argon for 30 min. Theobtained solution was added to a mixture of 2.80 g (8.40 mmol) ofN-phenyl-7-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine,2.90 g (8.40 mmol) ofN-[(6-bromopyridin-2-yl)methyl]-2,6-diisopropylaniline, 0.48 g (0.40mmol) of Pd(PPh₃)₄, and 120 mL of toluene. This mixture was stirred for12 hrs. (h) at 70° C., then cooled to 23° C. The organic layer wasseparated, the aqueous layer was extracted with 3×50 mL of ethylacetate. The combined organic extract was washed with brine, dried overNa₂SO₄ and evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified by flashchromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm, eluent: hexane-ethylacetate-triethylamine=100:5:1, vol.). Yield 2.00 g (50%) of a yellowoil. Anal. calc. For C₃₃H₃₇N₃: C 83.33; H 7.84; N 8.83. Found: C 83.49;H 7.66; N 8.65. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.56-7.61 (m, 3H, 6-H in indane and4.5-H in Py); 7.46-7.51 (m, 2H, 3,5-H in phenyl); 7.14-7.16 (m, 1H, 4-Hin indane); 7.08-7.12 (m, 5H, 3-H in Py, 3,4,5-H in2,6-diisopropylphenyl and 5-H in indane); 6.65 (m, 1H, 4-H in phenyl);6.53 (m, 2H, 2,6-H in phenyl); 5.21-5.22 (m, 1H, 1-H in indane);3.95-4.15 (m, 4H, CH₂NH and NH-phenyl and NH-2,6-diisopropylphenyl);3.31 (sept, J=6.8 Hz, 2H, CH in 2,6-diisopropylphenyl); 3.16-3.24 (m,1H, 3- or 3′-H in indane); 2.91-2.97 (m, 1H, 3′- or 3-H in indane);2.21-2.37 (m, 2H, 2,2′-H in indane); 1.19-2.21 (m, 12H, CH₃ in2,6-diisopropylaniline).

Preparation of pyridyldiamide catalyst precursor (PDA) Toluene (5 mL)was added to7-(6-(((2,6-diisopropylphenyl)amino)methyl)pyridin-2-yl)-N-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine(0.296 g, 0.623 mmol) and Hf(NMe₂)₂Cl₂(dme) (0.267 g, 0.623 mmol) toform a clear colorless solution. The mixture was loosely capped withaluminum foil and heated to 95° C. for 3 hrs. The mixture was thenevaporated to a solid and washed with Et₂O (5 mL) to afford 0.432 g ofthe presumed (pyridyldiamide) HfCl₁₂ complex. This was dissolved inCH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and cooled to −50° C. An Et₂O solution ofdimethylmagnesium (3.39 mL, 0.747 mmol) was added dropwise and themixture was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. After 30 min. thevolatiles were removed by evaporation and the residue was extracted withCH₂Cl₂ (10 mL) and filtered. The solution was concentrated to 2 mL andpentane (4 mL) was added. Cooling to −10° C. overnight affordedcolorless crystals that were isolated and dried under reduced pressure.Yield=0.41 g, 92%. ¹H NMR (CD₂Cl₂, 400 MHz): 8.00 (t, 1H), 6.85-7.65(13H), 5.06 (d, 1H), 4.91 (dd, 1H), 4.50 (d, 1H), 3.68 (sept, 1H), 3.41(m, 1H), 2.85 (m, 1H), 2.61 (sept, 1H), 2.03 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H), 1.30(m, 2H), 1.14 (d, 3H), 1.06 (d, 3H), 0.96 (d, 3H), 0.68 (3, 3H), −0.48(s, 3H), −0.84 (s, 3H).

Polymerization In particular, all examples were produced using asolution polymerization process in a 1.0-liter continuous stirred-tankreactor (autoclave reactor). The autoclave reactor was equipped with astirrer, a water-cooling/steam-heating element with a temperaturecontroller, and a pressure controller. Solvents and monomers werepurified by passing through purification columns packed with mol sieves.Isohexane (solvent) was passed through four columns in series whereasethylene, propylene, and toluene were each purified by passing throughtwo columns in series. Purification columns are regenerated periodically(about twice/year) or whenever there is evidence of low catalystactivity. 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene (ENB) was purified in a glove box bypassing through a bed of basic alumina under a steady nitrogen gaspurge. 5-vinyl-2-norbornene (VNB) was purified by stirring the dienewith sodium-potassium alloy (NaK) then filtering through a bed of basicor neutral alumina. Tri-n-octylaluminum (TNOAL, available from SigmaAldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.) solution was diluted to a concentration of1.84×10⁻⁶ using isohexane.

Catalyst used for examples 1-12 was the PDA catalyst described above (MW720.0 g/mol). The activator used was N,N-dimethylaniliniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate. Catalyst solution was prepared dailyand used on the same day. The solution was prepared by dissolving 40.0mg of the catalyst and 45.4 to 47.9 mg of the activator in 450 mLtoluene (catalyst concentration=1.24 to 1.30×10⁻⁰⁷ mol/mL,catalyst/activator (molar ratio) about 0.98). This solution was pumpedinto the reactor through a designated dip-tube at a desired rate usingan Isco pump.

The PDA catalyst precursor was fed at a rate of 9.26×10⁻⁸ mol/min forsamples 1-6; and 9.77×10⁻⁸ mol/min for samples 7-12; and activator wasfed at a rate of 9.45×10⁻⁸ mol/min for samples 1-6; and 9.97×10⁻⁸mol/min for samples 7-12. TNOAL was fed at a rate of 7.37×10⁻⁶ mol/min.

For examples 13-20, the catalyst used was the QDA catalyst describedabove (732.2 g/mol). The QDA catalyst precursor was fed at a rate of1.82×10⁻⁷ mol/min; and the activator (N,N-dimethylaniliniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate) was fed at a rate of 1.86×10⁻⁷mol/min. TNOAL was fed at a rate of 7.37×10⁻⁶ mol/min.

Composition was controlled by adjusting the feed ratio of the monomers.Ethylene and propylene feed rates were held constant for all exampleslisted in Table 1 while the diene feed rate was varied. No hydrogen wasadded. All the reactions were carried out at a gauge pressure of about2.2 MPa and a temperature of 110° C. The collected samples were firstplaced on a boiling-water steam table in a hood to evaporate a largefraction of the solvent and unreacted monomers, and then, dried in avacuum oven at a temperature of about 90° C. for about 12 hours. Thevacuum oven dried samples were weighed to obtain yields. Ethylene, ENB,and VNB (VNB incorporated only through the endocyclic double bond)content of the polymers were determined by FTIR (ASTM D3900, ASTMD6047). Monomer conversions were calculated using the polymer yield,composition and the amount of monomers fed into the reactor. Catalystactivity (also referred as to catalyst productivity) was calculatedbased upon the yield and the feed rate of catalyst. Mooney measurementswere made to gauge molecular weight and long-chain branching of the EPDMterpolymers. Samples were later analyzed using GPC as described below todetermine the molecular weight distribution as well as g′ values.

In Table 1, the reactor conditions for polymerization are set forth, andadditionally include a reactor temperature of 110° C.; reactor pressureof 320 psig; where the activator was N,N-dimethylaniliniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate; the catalyst feed was 9.2-9.8×10⁻⁸mol/min for PDA and 1.8×10⁻⁷ for QDA; an tri-n-octylaluminum feed was7.4×10⁻⁶ mol/min; and an isohexane feed of 60-65 g/min.

TABLE 1 Reactor Conditions for polymerization Reactor Input FT-IR dataEthylene Propylene ENB VNB Ethylene Feed Feed Feed Feed H₂ (wt %) ENBVNB Sample Catalyst (g/min) (g/min) (g/min) (g/min) (SCCM) uncorrected(wt %) (wt %) 1 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.00 — 51.1% — — 2 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.03 —57.2% — 0.1% 3 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.04 — 58.4% — 0.2% 4 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.00 —56.6% — 0.0% 5 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.03 — 64.5% — 0.1% 6 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.04 —63.6% — 0.2% 7 PDA 2.0 8.0 0.00 — 45.2% — — 8 PDA 2.0 8.0 0.04 — 54.4%0.8% — 9 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.00 — 48.2% — — 10 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.04 — 58.3% —0.2% 11 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.07 — 64.3% — 0.4% 12 PDA 2.0 8.0 — 0.11 — 65.0%— 0.6% 13 QDA 2.5 5.0 0.04 — 41.6% 0.6% — 14 QDA 2.5 5.0 0.04 2.0 43.9%0.5% — 15 QDA 2.5 5.0 0.07 2.0 49.3% 0.8% — 16 QDA 2.5 5.0 0.11 2.057.0% 1.0% — 17 QDA 2.5 5.0 0.14 2.0 58.0% 1.3% — 18 QDA 2.5 5.0 — 0.042.0 48.1% — 0.2% 19 QDA 2.5 5.0 — 0.07 2.0 55.0% — 0.4% 20 QDA 2.5 5.0 —0.11 2.0 55.3% — 0.7%

TABLE 2 Polymer Collection and Mooney Data Cat Collection EfficiencySample Time (g poly/g Sample ML MLRA quantity (g) (min) cat) 1 — — 37.315 37300 2 — — 24.5 15 24500 3 — — 20.7 15 20700 4 — — 29.4 15 29400 5 —— 24.0 20 18000 6 — — 39.3 30 19650 7 56.1 48.9 31.5 10 47250 8 53.055.7 69.1 30 34550 9 32.5 55.2 28.6 10 42900 10 23.1 50.8 44.2 30 2210011 20.8 62.9 33.5 30 16750 12 16.6 77.1 26.1 30 13050 13 70.5 159.9 78.020 29250 14 42.3 60.9 66.5 15 33250 15 54.8 58.7 58.1 15 29050 16 64.985.7 44.1 15 22050 17 54.1 59.4 53.5 20 20063 18 48.9 250.8 59.3 1529650 19 53.9 339.6 48.2 15 24100 20 27.2 154.7 45.6 15 22800

TABLE 3 Gel Permeation Chromatography Data Mn (LS), Mw (LS), Samplekg/mol kg/mol g′_(Avg) g′₁₀₀₀ wt % C2 units 1 64 131 1.032 — 51.09 2 51121 0.999 0.860 60.99 3 48 120 0.981 0.823 62.67 4 64 128 1.021 — 57.755 47 104 0.995 0.785 64.46 6 48 118 0.990 0.810 63.29 7 105 220 1.029 —42.85 8 87 197 0.990 0.870 52.87 9 83 175 1.028 — 46.00 10 54 142 0.9920.881 60.44 11 42 145 0.934 0.758 63.85 12 41 145 0.781 0.686 65.99 13130 258 1.029 1.009 40.29 14 96 193 1.021 1.057 43.73 15 102 201 1.0391.048 49.39 16 108 207 1.032 0.912 57.91 17 96 188 1.027 0.897 59.39 1882 230 0.906 0.746 47.95 19 75 222 0.874 0.709 55.36 20 52 165 0.8260.602 56.20

IR Spectrometry Total ethylene content of the elastomers was determinedusing a Nicolet 6700 FTIR (ASTM D3900, ASTM D6047). The granularelastomers from the reactor was first extruded and pelletized. Pelletsamples were compression molded into a 10 mil thick pad. The pressed padwas placed in the instrument such that the IR beam passes through thepad and then measures the remaining signal on the other side. Methylgroups from the propylene affect the absorption, so the machine wascalibrated to a range of ethylene content.

Mooney Viscosity and Mooney Relaxation Area Mooney viscosity is aproperty used to monitor the quality of both natural and syntheticrubbers. It measures the resistance of rubber to flow at a relativelylow shear rate. The highly branched polymers have a Mooney viscosity ML(1+4) at 125° C. of 30 to 100 MU (preferably 40 to 80, preferably 45 to70, preferably 50 to 65), where MU is Mooney Units.

While the Mooney viscosity indicates the plasticity of the rubber, theMooney relaxation area (MLRA) provides a certain indication of theeffects of molecular weight distribution and elasticity of the rubber.The highly branched compositions also have a MLRA of 30 to 100 MU(preferably 40 to 80, preferably 45 to 70).

Another indication of melt elasticity is the ratio of MLRA/ML (1+4).This ratio has the dimension of time and can be considered as a“relaxation time.” A higher number signifies a higher degree of meltelasticity. Long chain branching will slow down the relaxation of thepolymer chain, hence increasing the value of MLRA/ML (1+4). In thepresent compositions, the MLRA/ML is 1 or less, and as low as 0.9, or0.8.

Mooney viscosity and Mooney relaxation area are measured using a Mooneyviscometer, operated at an average shear rate of about 2 s⁻¹ accordingto the following modified ASTM D1646: A square of sample is placed oneither side of the rotor. The cavity is filled by pneumatically loweringthe upper platen. The upper and lower platens are electrically heatedand controlled at 125° C. The torque to turn the rotor at 2 rpm ismeasured by a torque transducer. The sample is preheated for 1 min.after the platens was closed. The motor is then started and the torqueis recorded for a period of 4 min. Results are reported as ML (1+4) at125° C., where M is Mooney viscosity number, L denotes the large rotor,“1” is the sample preheat time in min., “4” is the sample run time inmin. after the motor starts, and 125° C. is the test temperature.

The MLRA data is obtained from the Mooney viscosity measurement when therubber relaxed after the rotor is stopped. The MLRA is the integratedarea under the Mooney torque-relaxation time curve from 1 to 100 secs.The MLRA can be regarded as a stored energy term which suggests that,after the removal of an applied strain, the longer or branched polymerchains can store more energy and require longer time to relax.Therefore, the MLRA value of a bimodal rubber (the presence of adiscrete polymeric fraction with very high molecular weight and distinctcomposition) or a long chain branched rubber are larger than a broad ora narrow molecular weight rubber when compared at the same Mooneyviscosity values.

Mooney viscosity values greater than about 100 cannot generally bemeasured using ML (1+4) at 125° C. In this event, a higher temperatureis used (e.g., 150° C.), with eventual longer shearing time (i.e., 1+8at 125° C. or 150° C.), but more preferably, the Mooney measurement iscarried out using a non-standard small rotor as described below. Thenon-standard rotor design is employed with a change in Mooney scale thatallows the same instrumentation on the Mooney machine to be used withhigher Mooney rubbers. This rotor is termed MST, Mooney Small Thin, incontrast with ML.

Molecular Weight Determinations The distribution and the moments ofmolecular weight (Mw, Mn, Mz, and Mw/Mn) in Table 1 were determined byusing a high temperature Gel Permeation Chromatography (Polymer CharGPC-IR) equipped with a multiple-channel band-filter based Infrareddetector IR5, an 18-angle light scattering detector and a viscometer(not used here). The GPC trace and mass balance traces are for Sample 3are shown in FIG. 1. Three Agilent PLgel 10 μm Mixed-B LS columns wereused to provide polyolefin separation through size exclusion. Aldrichreagent grade 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) with 300 ppm of theantioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene was used as the mobile phase. TheTCB mixture was filtered through a 0.1 μm polytetrafluoroethylene filterand degas sed with an online degas ser before entering the GPCinstrument. The nominal flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the nominalinjection volume was 200 μL. The whole system including transfer lines,columns, detectors were contained in an oven maintained at 145° C. Agiven amount of polyolefin sample was weighed and sealed in a standardvial with 80 μL flow marker (heptane) added to it. After loading thevial in the auto-sampler, polyolefin was automatically dissolved in theinstrument with 8 mL added TCB solvent. The polyolefin was dissolved at160° C. with continuous shaking for about 1 hr. for most polyethylenesamples or 2 hrs. for polypropylene samples. The TCB densities used inconcentration calculation were 1.463 g/mL at 23° C. and 1.284 g/mL at145° C. The sample solution concentration was from 0.2 to 2.0 mg/mL,with lower concentrations being used for higher molecular weightsamples.

The concentration “c” at each point in the chromatogram was calculatedfrom the baseline-subtracted IR5 broadband signal intensity “I” usingthe following equation:c=βI,where β is the mass constant determined with polyethylene orpolypropylene standards. The mass recovery was calculated from the ratioof the integrated area of the concentration chromatography over elutionvolume and the injection mass which is equal to the pre-determinedconcentration multiplied by injection loop volume.

The conventional molecular weight (IR molecular weight “M”) wasdetermined by combining universal calibration relationship with thecolumn calibration which was performed with a series of mono-dispersedpolystyrene (PS) standards ranging from 700 g/mole to 10,000,000 g/mole.The molecular weight “M” at each elution volume was calculated withfollowing equation:

${{\log\mspace{14mu} M} = {\frac{\log\left( {K_{PS}/K} \right)}{a + 1} + {\frac{a_{PS} + 1}{a + 1}\log\mspace{14mu} M_{PS}}}},$where the variables with subscript “PS” stands for “polystyrene” whilethose without a subscript are for the test samples. In this method,a_(PS)=0.67 and K_(PS)=0.000175 while “a” and “K” are calculated from aseries of empirical formula established in the literature (T. Sun, P.Brant, R. R. Chance, and W. W. Graessley, 34(19) MACROMOLECULES6812-6820 (2001)). Specifically, the value of a/K is 0.695/0.000579 forpolyethylene and 0.705/0.0002288 for polypropylene. Molecular weight isexpressed in g/mole or kg/mole. The values for Mw are determined ±500g/mole, and for Mn±100 g/mole.

The comonomer composition is determined by the ratio of the IR5 detectorintensity corresponding to CH₂ and CH₃ channel calibrated with a seriesof PE and PP homo/copolymer standards whose nominal value arepredetermined by NMR or FTIR such as an ExxonMobil Chemical Companycommercial grade of LLDPE, polypropylene, etc.

The LS detector is the 18-angle Wyatt Technology High Temperature DawnHeleosii™. The LS molecular weight “M” at each point in the chromatogramis determined by analyzing the LS output using the Zimm model for staticlight scattering (W. Burchard & W. Ritchering, “Dynamic Light Scatteringfrom Polymer Solutions,” in 80 PROGRESS IN COLLOID & P OLYMER SCIENCE,151-163 (Steinkopff, 1989)):

${\frac{K_{o}c}{\Delta\;{R(\theta)}} = {\frac{1}{{MP}(\theta)} + {2A_{2}c}}},$here, ΔR(θ) is the measured excess Rayleigh scattering intensity atscattering angle θ, “c” is the polymer concentration determined from theinfrared analysis, A₂ is the second virial coefficient. P(θ) is the formfactor for a monodisperse random coil, and K_(o) is the optical constantfor the system:

${K_{o} = \frac{4\pi^{2}{n^{2}\left( {{{dn}/d}\; c} \right)}^{2}}{\lambda^{4}N_{A}}},$where N_(A) is Avogadro's number, and (dn/dc) is the refractive indexincrement for the system. The refractive index, n=1.500 for TCB at 145°C. and λ=665 nm.

A high temperature Agilent (or Viscotek Corporation) viscometer, whichhas four capillaries arranged in a Wheatstone bridge configuration withtwo pressure transducers, is used to determine specific viscosity andbranching. One transducer measures the total pressure drop across thedetector, and the other, positioned between the two sides of the bridge,measures a differential pressure. The specific viscosity, η_(s), for thesolution flowing through the viscometer is calculated from theiroutputs. The intrinsic viscosity, [η], at each point in the chromatogramis calculated from the following equation:[η]=η_(S) /c,where c is concentration and was determined from the infrared (IR5)broadband channel output. The viscosity “M” at each point is calculatedfrom the below equation:M=K _(PS) M ^(αPS+1)/[η].

The branching index (g′_(avg)) is calculated using the output of theGPC-IR5-LS-VIS method as follows. The average intrinsic viscosity,[η_(avg)], of the sample is calculated by:

${\lbrack\eta\rbrack_{avg} = \frac{\sum\;{c_{i}\lbrack\eta\rbrack}_{i}}{\sum\; c_{i}}},$where the summations are over the chromatographic slices, “i”, betweenthe integration limits. The branching index g′_(avg) is defined as:

$g_{avg}^{\prime} = {\frac{\lbrack\eta\rbrack_{avg}}{{kM}_{v}^{\alpha}}.}$

The M_(v) is the viscosity-average molecular weight based on molecularweights determined by LS analysis. Also, as used herein the g′₁₀₀₀ isthe value of g′ at a molecular weight of 1,000,000 g/mole, thus ameasure of the amount of branching on the high molecular weightcomponent of the polymer. Branching data for inventive Sample 3 is shownin FIG. 1.

Phase Angle Dynamic shear melt rheological data was measured with anAdvanced Rheometrics Expansion System (ARES) using parallel plates(diameter=25 mm) in a dynamic mode under nitrogen atmosphere. For allexperiments, the rheometer was thermally stable at 190° C. for at least30 min. before inserting compression-molded sample of resin onto theparallel plates. To determine the samples viscoelastic behavior,frequency sweeps in the range from 0.01 to 385 rad/s were carried out ata temperature of 190° C. under constant strain. Depending on themolecular weight and temperature, strains of 10% and 15% were used andlinearity of the response was verified. A nitrogen stream was circulatedthrough the sample oven to minimize chain extension or cross-linkingduring the experiments. All the samples were compression molded at 190°C. and no stabilizers were added. A sinusoidal shear strain is appliedto the material. If the strain amplitude is sufficiently small thematerial behaves linearly. It can be shown that the resultingsteady-state stress will also oscillate sinusoidally at the samefrequency but will be shifted by a phase angle Δ with respect to thestrain wave. The stress leads the strain by Δ. For purely elasticmaterials Δ=0° (stress is in phase with strain) and for purely viscousmaterials, Δ=90° (stress leads the strain by 90° although the stress isin phase with the strain rate). For viscoelastic materials, 0<Δ<90. Theshear thinning slope (STS) was measured using plots of the logarithm(base ten) of the dynamic viscosity versus logarithm (base ten) of thefrequency. The slope is the difference in the log(dynamic viscosity) ata frequency of 100 s⁻¹ and the log(dynamic viscosity) at a frequency of0.01 s⁻¹ divided by 4. Dynamic viscosity is also referred to as complexviscosity or dynamic shear viscosity.

Rheological data may be presented by plotting the phase angle versus theabsolute value of the complex modulus (G*) to produce a van Gurp-Palmenplot. The plot of conventional polyethylene polymers shows monotonicbehavior and a negative slope toward higher G* values. ConventionalLLDPE polymer without long chain branches exhibit a negative slope onthe van Gurp-Palmen plot. For branched modifiers, the phase angels shiftto a lower value as compared with the phase angle of a conventionalethylene polymer without long chain branches at the same value of G*.The van Gurp-Palmen plots of some embodiments of the branched modifierpolymers described in the present disclosure exhibit two slopes—apositive slope at lower G* values and a negative slope at higher G*values. Such a plot is presented in FIG. 2a and FIG. 2 b.

Sentmanat Extensional Rheology Extensional Rheometry was performed on anAnton-Paar MCR 501 or TA Instruments DHR-3 using a SER Universal TestingPlatform (Xpansion Instruments, LLC), model SER2-P or SER3-G. The SER(Sentmanat Extensional Rheometer) Testing Platform is described in U.S.Pat. Nos. 6,578,413 and 6,691,569. A general description of transientuniaxial extensional viscosity measurements is provided, for example, in“Strain hardening of various polyolefins in uniaxial elongational flow,”47(3) THE SOCIETY OF RHEOLOGY, INC., J. RHEOL., 619-630 (2003); and“Measuring the transient extensional rheology of polyethylene meltsusing the SER universal testing platform,” 49(3) THE SOCIETY OFRHEOLOGY, INC., J. RHEOL., 585-606 (2005). Strain hardening occurs whena polymer is subjected to uniaxial extension and the transientextensional viscosity increases more than what is predicted from linearviscoelastic theory. Strain hardening is observed as abrupt upswing ofthe extensional viscosity in the transient extensional viscosity versustime plot. A strain hardening ratio (SHR) is used to characterize theupswing in extensional viscosity and is defined as the ratio of themaximum transient extensional viscosity over three times the value ofthe transient zero-shear-rate viscosity at the same strain. Strainhardening is present in the material when the ratio is greater than 1.The SER instrument consists of paired master and slave windup drumsmounted on bearings housed within a chassis and mechanically coupled viaintermeshing gears. Rotation of the drive shaft results in a rotation ofthe affixed master drum and an equal but opposite rotation of the slavedrum which causes the ends of the polymer sample to be sound up onto thedrums resulting in the sample stretched. The sample is mounted to thedrums via securing clamps in most cases. In addition to the extensionaltest, samples are also tested using transient steady shear conditionsand matched to the extensional data using a correlation factor of three.This provides the linear viscoelastic envelope (LVE). Rectangular samplespecimens with dimensions approximately 18.0 mm long×12.70 mm wide aremounted on the SER fixture. Samples are generally tested at three Henckystrain rates: 0.01 s⁻¹, 0.1 s⁻¹ and 1 s⁻¹. The testing temperature is150° C. The polymer samples were prepared as follows: the samplespecimens were hot pressed at 190° C., mounted to the fixture, andequilibrated at 150° C. Such plots are presented in FIG. 3 for acomparative elastomer and FIG. 4 for an inventive Sample 3 elastomer.

With respect to a composition or polyolefin, “consisting essentially of”means that the claimed polyolefin, composition and/or article includesthe named components and no additional components that will alter itsmeasured properties by any more than ±1, 2, 5, or 10%, and mostpreferably means that “additives” are present, if at all, to a level ofless than 5, or 4, or 3, or 2 wt % by weight of the composition. Suchadditional additives can include, for example, inorganic fillers (suchas talc, glass, and other minerals), carbon black, nucleators,clarifiers, colorants (soluble and insoluble), foaming agents,antioxidants, alkyl-radical scavengers (preferably vitamin E or othertocopherols and/or tocotrienols), anti-ultraviolet light agents, acidscavengers, curatives and cross-linking agents, mineral and syntheticoils, aliphatic and/or cyclic containing oligomers or polymers (andother “hydrocarbon resins”), and other additives well known in the art.

With respect to a process or apparatus, the phrase “consistingessentially of” means that the claimed process does not include anyother process steps (or apparatus features/means) that change the natureof the overall claimed process, such as an additional polymerizationstep, or additional olefin/polyolefin separation step, or additionalre-directing of polymerization medium flow, heating, cooling,pressurizing, and/or depressurizing that impart a change in the finalpolyolefin product by any more than ±1, 2, or 5% from a measuredchemical properties.

For all jurisdictions in which the doctrine of “incorporation byreference” applies, all of the test methods, patent publications,patents and reference articles are hereby incorporated by referenceeither in their entirety or for the relevant portion for which they arereferenced.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A process to produce a branchedethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer (b-EDE) comprising combining acatalyst precursor and an activator with a feed comprising ethylene, C₃to C₁₂ α-olefins, and a dual-polymerizable diene to obtain a b-EDE;where the catalyst precursor is selected from pyridyldiamide andquinolinyldiamido transition metal complexes, wherein the pyridyldiamidoand quinolinyldiamido transition metal complexes are selected from oneof the following structures:

wherein M is titanium, hafnium or zirconium; R¹ and R¹⁰ areindependently selected from the group consisting of hydrocarbyls,substituted hydrocarbyls, heterohydrocarbyls, and silyl groups; R² andR⁹ are each, independently, divalent hydrocarbyls or a chemical bond;R³, R⁴, R⁵, R⁶, R⁷, and R⁸ are independently selected from the groupconsisting of hydrogen, hydrocarbyls, substituted hydrocarbyls, alkoxy,aryloxy, halogen, amino, and silyl, and wherein adjacent R groups may bejoined to form a substituted or unsubstituted hydrocarbyl orheterocyclic ring, where the ring has 5, 6, 7, or 8 ring atoms and wheresubstitutions on the ring can join to form additional rings; X is ananionic leaving group, where the X groups may be the same or differentand any two X groups may be linked to form a dianionic leaving group;and Z is —(R¹¹)_(p)QJ(R¹²)_(q)—, wherein Q is carbon, oxygen, nitrogen,or silicon, and where J is carbon or silicon, p is 1 or 2; and q is 1 or2; and R¹¹ and R¹² are independently selected from the group consistingof hydrogen, hydrocarbyls, and substituted hydrocarbyls, and whereinadjacent R¹¹ and R¹² groups may be joined to form an aromatic orsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted hydrocarbyl ring, where the ringhas 5, 6, 7, or 8 ring carbon atoms and where substitutions on the ringcan join to form additional rings.
 2. The process of claim 1, combiningat a temperature within a range from 80° C. to 160° C. and a pressurewithin a range from 0.5 MPa to 8 MPa.
 3. The process of claim 1,combining in a solution process.
 4. The process of claim 1, alsocombining a singly-polymerizable diene.
 5. The process of claim 1,wherein the α-olefins comprise propylene.
 6. The process of claim 1,wherein hydrogen is present to less than 5 sccm (standard cubiccentimeter per min.).
 7. The process of claim 4, wherein the b-EDEcomprises within a range from 40 to 80 wt % of ethylene-derived units byweight of the b-EDE, 0.05 to 2 wt % of the dual-polymerizable dienederived units by weight of the b-EDE, and 0 to 15 wt % of thesingly-polymerizable diene derived units by weight of the b-EDE, theremainder comprising C₃ to C₁₂ α-olefin derived units.
 8. The process ofclaim 1, wherein the b-EDE has a weight average molecular weight (Mw)within a range from 100 kg/mole to 750 kg/mole.
 9. The process of claim1, wherein the b-EDE has a g′_(avg) of 0.9 or more, and a g′₁₀₀₀ of lessthan 0.9.
 10. A process to produce a branched ethylene-α-olefin dieneelastomer (b-EDE) comprising combining a catalyst precursor and anactivator with a feed comprising ethylene, C₃ to C₁₂ α-olefins, and adual-polymerizable diene to obtain a b-EDE; where the catalyst precursoris selected from pyridyldiamide and quinolinyldiamido transition metalcomplexes, wherein the catalyst precursor is a transition metal complexselected from one of the following structures:

wherein the “Me” represents methyl and “iPr” represents iso-propyl. 11.A process to produce a branched ethylene-α-olefin diene elastomer(b-EDE) comprising combining a catalyst precursor and an activator witha feed comprising ethylene, C₃ to C₁₂ α-olefins, and adual-polymerizable diene to obtain a b-EDE; where the catalyst precursoris selected from pyridyldiamide and quinolinyldiamido transition metalcomplexes, wherein the catalyst precursor is a transition metal complexselected from one of the following structures:

wherein the R1 and R2 are any C₁ to C₁₀ alkyl (normal, iso, and/ortertiary).